data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b3ff/7b3fff6c09967b8496ac6b128f38893d813816fd" alt=""
16 January 2010 | 23 replies
Chase has also come out with similar language, that according to my attorney is questionable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
11 July 2012 | 12 replies
Somehow the developer in the 1950's failed to exempt his 1/2 when he sold the property with the new SFH, and that 1/2 has stayed with the land through all the transfers through this year.I toyed with keeping them, just for fun, but the deal was ready to close and escrow was already funded and I didn't want to confuse my buyer.Mineral rights language typically allows for surface access, so always read your title report.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/755e9/755e946cbdbeea366716dc3ea81915fff9b9dcce" alt=""
26 July 2011 | 3 replies
In general, my guess is that the onus is on you to ensure that the bill is paid, regardless of whether you receive notification; but if you are officially told that you're paid in full, it seems a little shady that you're later told that wasn't the case.Of course, if it went in front of a judge, you'd like have to prove that the information they gave you was erroneous and that it led to the fees you later incurred.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/162b1/162b122b7a9956d6533a44fa0ea2dbcf5f317404" alt=""
1 July 2013 | 23 replies
There’s nothing instructive there.I'm ALL for open market solutions to the housing and finance “crisis crap" (pardon my language)...The solution is the use of small, private-investor assisted liquidation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f0cd/3f0cda59eb96f091404fb273edcc540375b3f98c" alt=""
16 April 2013 | 52 replies
Not technically a real estate company, however, due to their large amount of RE holdings/assets, this is the place for this thread.As many of you know, there is a BP thread about the terrible business practices of BofA (Bank of America) named "the official BofA Sucks Thread"This thread is not to talk about those instances, but to inform all and hopefully for us ALL to come together and fight this crooked corporation who is "Too big to fail"It seems we are all in the "entitlement age" where most Americans stick their heads in the sand and continue with their entitled behaviors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ed81/8ed81d36ec162fa7b0ce2d2861d0947ebc906d26" alt=""
28 July 2011 | 7 replies
You can officially take over the loan responsibility.
9 August 2011 | 13 replies
In general all contracts are assignable unless they contain language to prohibit it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43d28/43d28f003b407d2e1c50e12495502b07ca486582" alt=""
17 August 2011 | 3 replies
Basically, it is a hearing to determine validity of the mortgagee's claim on non-payment by the borrower, which if favors the mortgagee, turns out to be a judgment against the borrower, which results in foreclosure officially beginning.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae197/ae197ea220737aa85cc3cfb83eed690769a67a51" alt=""
18 August 2011 | 5 replies
Some states have statutes regarding the language of the notice and whether it has to be served but it is the typical penny wise/pound foolish example to not spend a couple dollars to protect your rights.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b18/30b18fde4ba952d1de36a116cd2b3eae769230b7" alt=""
24 September 2011 | 104 replies
Yes people can find out what address is on the tax roles, but they do not know who the beneficiary or Trustee is as this is an easy way to hide.When you say you "move" your homes into a "land trust" (which by the way is not an officially recognized entity for holding residential real estate in Texas), are you saying you purchase them in your own name first, then transfer them to your "land trust" after?