Perhaps you are liberal on social issues?

This guy believes that the Patriot Act has usurped our freedoms, we should stop wasting money on ridiculous wars that "are not in our interest" and says flat-out that "we must resist the temptation of their neocon-inspired scaremongering"...http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-01-02/ron-paul-stop-the-police-state-repeal-the-patriot-act/Must be one of those damn Liberals that the fake Conservatives on this forum can't stand...Oh wait...

This guy hasn't lifted a finger in 6 months and he wants the jackpot.

I small bank can be in worse shap than a larger regional bank.The advantage with a smaller bank is that officers and directors are usually local, the loan policy can be more liberal and allow for more flexibility in lending than say BoA where guidelines are set in stone.

Shoot, liberals are still complaining that Bush stole the election back in 2000.

He did a wonderful job in the fight against aids,and malaria in Africa Bush really wasn't as bad as liberals claimed.

Although I don't identify myself as a liberal.

just like eddie ziv and workerdrone I'm guilty of living in a liberal state that could care less about the well being of the people in the long term.

But their wages have increased tremendously over the past three decades (since they started economic liberalization) and their businesses have adjusted to that partly by increased productivity and partly through higher value items.

I read the Economist religiously and thought about including them in my list above; but, I find that they generally tend to be "fiscally conservative" (though not always) and "socially liberal", so I assumed most people would argue that they aren't really objective, since they lean in both directions.But, I definitely agree that most of their writers tend to be pretty fair, even if some of the topics slant one way or the other...