I don’t agree to this but it is my interpretation of the rules.  

My strategy with "stopping by" is that the medium of email is oftentimes interpreted in the perception of the reader, not the sender. 

Is my interpretation correct ?

I’m glad I’m not the only one who interpreted it that way.  

I've never been "burned" but I guess that can be open to interpretation on what burned means.

Each inspector is different, many are good, but some are not and each has their own interpretation of the code. 

Florida’s state level regs are a whole different animal to deal with as well and I can’t claim to be an expert on those (I specialize in every other Gulf state and the Great Plains).To make things worse, a judge in AZ just struck down the current interpretation the Army Corps was using to define what wetlands they had jurisdiction over.

One other thing, I think you are miss interpreting the IRS rules. 

Let me know if you want to chat further,  My interpretation of the just cause requirement is that it only applies to evictions and not lease terminations.  

@Chris Baxter I agree tenants and landlords are going to have differing views on how they interpret the dispute resolution process/decision making.