data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/462dc/462dcd5baa524b336af835e08da5ba6af05b92ce" alt=""
25 February 2025 | 0 replies
I pay water ($130) and pest control.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08a16/08a16893559b93453c5db12de534c47d51dbcb6e" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 18 replies
Is BP a hot spot for high volume wholesalers?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d266/7d266c2ae13afcb83da0fa3ca588a1b6c50ca747" alt=""
16 February 2025 | 7 replies
If you get 100 leads, about 2 - 5 will be "hot", meaning they'll be at or below 70% of ARV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/550f9/550f9c4fd06eb2736a73683bec33546a823d72f3" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 11 replies
With Risk Rating 2.0, FEMA looks at several factors to assess a property's real flood risk.Key Factors Considered- Property Location: How close the property is to water sources (rivers, lakes, coasts).- Flood Frequency: How often the area floods historically.- Types of Floods: Includes heavy rainfall, storm surges, and river overflow.- Elevation and Distance from Water: Higher and farther properties generally face lower risk.- Rebuilding Costs: Higher-value homes may have higher premiums due to more expensive repairs.What This Means for Homeowners- Fairer Premiums: Properties with lower risk may see lower premiums, while higher-risk properties may face increased costs.- Gradual Rate Increases: Increases are phased in over time for policyholders who see higher premiums, with annual caps on the rate hike.- More Predictable Rates: Rates better reflect the real risk rather than just being based on a flood zone map.Example Scenario (Simplified)- Old System: A house in a designated flood zone pays $1,000 annually, regardless of its elevation or distance from the water.- Risk Rating 2.0: That same house may now pay $1,200 if it's closer to the water and more vulnerable or $800 if it's higher up and better protected.Flood zones still matter under Risk Rating 2.0, but their role has changed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26a88/26a88231440fd3ad6ce2bca1dd85c220ffd9b60b" alt=""
15 February 2025 | 4 replies
Both are great markets, but CLT is hot right now, and far less expensive compared to inner Boston.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02033/0203377b4bebd177c988e88dd507c4c0a69cc9d4" alt=""
23 February 2025 | 3 replies
Paying for a Section 8 investment course is the equivalent of an aspiring cook paying for a course titled: How To Boil Water
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5b8a/c5b8a3332068cae3b3fbf9209fb7a1e574b8d042" alt=""
7 February 2025 | 6 replies
Then wherever the water is getting discharged off of the roof, that what water is getting at least 4-5 foot away from the structure before it is left to drain with gravity away from the property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b761/6b76130aa6b69942e31ac72ebeccd11da870e42f" alt=""
26 February 2025 | 23 replies
I work mostly with relocation and higher-end clients and consumers think a super hot market is good for agents.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4635/f46351105032e33c30af47f401553418e667b747" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 6 replies
Land + soft costs (architect, engineering, water, etc. - any cost accounted for prior to permit) should be considered as equity in the deal once ready to build.