Based on your description, Party 1 seems like the safer choice.

Also thank you for the great description of your business and its history and inner workings.

I used those as my guidelines and I list them in the description.

My concern is that a lot of younger, inexperienced and unsophisticated folks get fooled into believing that their hard earned money is going to "buy" property in these kinds of arrangements (i.e. believing they are not "throwing money away on rent") whereas throwing their money away on rent + even more money should the option fail is a better description of what is actually happening. 

Outside of that, we use it to update our listing descriptions periodically, as well as responding to guest questions.Hope that helps.MIke

Granite, I know CA tends to see a lot of this; more than likely due to a lot of people owning Solar.My question is the owner that has a lien status associated to this Lien description (Notice of an Independent Solar Energy Producer Contract), is this a standard practice of just owning Solar (thus wasting time prospecting these individuals) or does this simply mean they (the solar company) took out a lien against the owner because the solar company is trying to collect their money.

It would be on an auction site with pictures/a description of which each unit rents for.

For example searching on keywords in both the description and private remarks that aren't shown to the public. 

Based on your description, if you take on responsibilities such as decorating, marketing, bookings, and bookkeeping, you could potentially meet the hours required, even with a property manager handling on-site tasks like maintenance.

The landlord paid utilities are via the listing agent's description, although they are not exact.