Creating laws for the few bad actors and applying them to the majority will only create more problems.

I would start with a written violation and demand they clean up their act or move out.

In addition, the complaints are reading that the non-profit used actual actors/"testers" to reach out to me on these listings to confirm what these 2 individuals were saying was true, which of course, I also replied, "Sorry, no vouchers".Now I've had to hire a lawyer who specializes in cases like this, and has actually gone up against this non-profit in the past, but with a much bigger client who owned 20+ apartment buildings, and was also openly saying "no Section 8 vouchers".

Not as a trainer or guru but as a Back of the room Vendor ( Lender to the students looking to fix and flip or BRRR) the high profile guru's just take a page out of Amway and MLM .. huge budgets professional actors as there front folks .. presentations that are geared to what everyone wants financial freedom and more time with the kiddos thats the hot buttons..

sounds like the do hardmoney model and from the same neck of the woods.. would not be surprised if it was the same actors or an off shoot of them 

You can die for your country in war, but cant enter a contract in Alabama. 

The closing attorney will know the actors in that field.A

Quote from @Robin Simon: Agreed - but a conflict of interest can certainly exist with all good actors involved - I don't think it's relevant.

ANd they dont care about their credit and make sure their is no deficiency judgement there are bad actors out there that will intentionally not pay the mortgage and rip the rents until the bank forecloses a few years down the line all the while creamting the original sellers credit and frying their nerves and freying their marriage.

The “gurus” feeding this information are usually paid actors who have limited or no experience in real estate investing or the real estate industry.