
22 May 2018 | 5 replies
My asking price is $100,000 which would put this as a rare 2% rule property.

22 May 2018 | 5 replies
Following this "Rule", you will never need any more money from other sources, since you will continuously be supplying your own...at will.Use your seed money, spend your profits...after, you've reinvested your initial profits to expand the original seed money.

30 June 2020 | 8 replies
Other cities have different tax rules and tax rates.

19 May 2018 | 6 replies
When you decide the asset type, then you set up your buying rules/ criteria.
21 May 2018 | 9 replies
When you are doing deals with a partner, it is (as a general rule) a very good idea to be set up as an entity.

24 May 2018 | 8 replies
Other thing to be aware of is secondary market has some strange rules about reserves once you reach anything over 4 units.

25 May 2018 | 11 replies
@Patrick Daniel thanks for the encouragement. i think the competition is increasing because as we approach the summer time, it'll be difficult for me to be competitive. i think i'll be more aggressive come sept-oct. that said, i know i can't use the traditional 70% rule since i'm not going full rehab and rather going the route of livable+small rehab.after hearing a few podcast episodes of bigger podcast, the double close made more sense and jotted some notes. the wholesaler/buyer's list route will require more research on my end especially as it relates to those with a conventional loan. great point to bring it up!

23 May 2018 | 3 replies
Unless you have the actual financial data to back your analysis you would be better served staying conservative using something closer to the 50% rule for expenses.It could be a possible deal if you could have a lower Purchase price and/or room to raise rents.

4 April 2019 | 46 replies
I plan on putting down new rules and cleaning, painting, and buying an o zone machine for when people move out.

23 May 2018 | 5 replies
Howdy @Jason HowellI strongly recommend you stick to using the 50% rule for expenses so you stay conservative with your analysis.