16 May 2017 | 19 replies
So we have no problem at all with filling vacancies, often we need to remove the ads days after we put them up as we get so many applications.I would look at how much exposure they are getting on their ads and where the manager has it posted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86568/86568723181122275fbdb94f7f95fbe2d592c08e" alt=""
11 May 2014 | 6 replies
Originally posted by @John Chapman: Albert, What would be an approximate rate and terms for refinancing a duplex at 70% LTV with no cash back.The product above was only for SFR's pricing was phenomenal at around 4.375 to 4.50% 30 year fixed unlimited financed properties 740+ fico only and 9 months reserves on all properties with a maxim exposure of 3.5 mil to one individual borrower up to 70% LTVI have another portfolio product that will accommodate 2-4 unlimited financed properties: You're probably ranging from 5.125 to 7.25% from 5/1 ARM up to 10/1 ARM if you need more time all on 30 year amortization terms with Prin/Int payments.There are adjustments to rate and points depending on your terms and this product is only up to 55% LTV market value.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3377/d337758639bd7ad4bb8ad0b4a11e05b0211674fb" alt=""
10 October 2007 | 8 replies
I also have exposure to mortgage financing, accts. receivable finance, purchase order financing and commercial letters of credit.I decided to focus on the pre-foreclosure market to do two things.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2c93/e2c9334e773e69cfbd3c299cb7efd08168d98d09" alt=""
15 November 2015 | 7 replies
I would suggest you listen to the podcasts as they are easy and give you a wide exposure while covering the basics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5930/d5930abd17ea98b921fa0a2cc90575810e22bd49" alt=""
10 October 2019 | 4 replies
They are very receptive and I consider it a treat for them to have such exposure to these opportunities at a young age.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18a88/18a884a759601fa5cf5c479374c6e9925f23abbd" alt=""
6 October 2017 | 5 replies
The savings is usually minimal and you're exposure to lawsuit has increased.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad72c/ad72c351a55aacd49185eb4752d9cc89c57827f0" alt=""
17 February 2016 | 11 replies
Maybe you could pay their deductible if you feel responsible and that may limit your exposure (if they have insurance and it is covered of course).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46c1d/46c1df03e0a415881ed05391b569bc2e60d0db0e" alt=""
24 January 2019 | 3 replies
Too much exposure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5158/b51583db849cf0446d6817e5bbabb60a77483af0" alt=""
7 August 2008 | 5 replies
You miss out on the tax deduction, thus increasing your tax exposure, you open the door for frivoluos lawsuits, you lose the power of leverage, and perhaps the most detramental point is that the equity sitting in the walls of your home earns you a grand total return of 0%.Use the equity to buy RE, use leverage, keep every tax deduction available to you, and acquire many more properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f401/6f401fa2b882496449db4d0254b94fdbd937bb32" alt=""
19 July 2009 | 1 reply
put the link in your signature so that it's getting exposure on all of your posts.