I just hope this trend of over regulation & legislation get's reevaluated objectively.

 My Husband and I are just now starting with real estate investing and we  went to a live event this past  weekend put on by Phil Grove and his wife - it was very informative and was very well planned and smooth ( I'm a professional sales person)  it was fun to see the whole sales pitch unfold for the coaching program - knocking out the objections throughout the presentation before they come, building value, taking people into their pain and getting to the WHY , giving information while all at the same time saying everything for a reason without coming off like a salesperson,  and then the cherry on top was  to see how they charge an enormous amount of money to sell a program just to have the students go out and do the marketing to bring him and his team deals to partner on, the big picture of his business was an amazing master mind project - I was really impressed from a sales stand point I felt that it was very smooth and done with class, class because they really did make the event informative which is something that is lacking at most of the meetups I have attended, although most of the info was to train the attendees enough to be able to go out and market to bring in deals for them to partner on - I was actually very  interested in the program but they are asking  a SIGNIFICANT amount of money and were not exactly clear on exactly what you get for it other that the "network"  which he did mention many times that your network is your networth  ;-) .

Putting forth good fundamentals in your loans with ensuring borrowers can earn equity; proper allocation of needed advances are set aside and try remaining objective with your loan treatments as opposed to forcing a loan to bend to your will help weather the storm.

Millennials make less money, have a lower employment rate, and have much higher expenses (having children too early, fascination with shiny objects, lack of fiscal responsibility) than generations past.

It's hard to step back and be objective.

Otherwise, you will get this problematic tenant out (eventually) and just end up with another one (maybe even worse)...Develop your own screening recipe (just use objective, legal criteria). 

I would bet it was because you were certain you KNEW what you were talking about, and you could handle any objection or situation. 

Since this is our endeavor into rental real estate, our main objective is to find a very stable solid market.  

Rent strike should follow the local landlord/tenant laws but should include notification and time to resolve, and if they signed a lead based paint acknowledgement, its on them because they knew about it.I would object to them raising the issue at all in eviction court.  

@Steve Walko I encourage you to objectively look at your posts and you will see that you suffer from confirmation bias.