There's nothing wrong with that, you have less liability and exposure cash wise.

REITs can be an alternative way to gain exposure to the U.S. real estate market.

Carryover exposure from your dental practice?

And I always recommend liability limits of no less than 500k, 1 million preferred for commercial exposures. 

I believe they mentioned that some paints tend to cover lead exposure, but they aren't permitted in CA, so that was the end of that discussion during our lead class.

With the exposure you mentioned, this method can make a decent income while you figure out your exit plan.

What is your exposure in the event you are sued?

So mortgagees will limit their capital exposure in general.  

If they were motivated, why not give it to a realtor who can get them more exposure?

I'm not saying you should have one entity per property, but I am saying the equity exposure (no matter how many or few properties) is the issue.This is a tough call as your attempt to avoid risk is valid, even at the expense of another entity, but do keep n mind it is not bucket proof.