Things we look for when we tour properties:Not updated (entrance) property sign/logo - must adapt to current times not when the property was first built; must attract high quality residence Logo not in appropriate sizing/ color, not big enough to see - logo must be emphasized so people can see hence it will bound to be useless; so people will be aware where to goNot well maintained foliage or garden stripsNot coordinated paint scheme (exterior) of the unitsWall (exterior) stainsFurniture (owned by tenant) not well kept in front of the apartment unitPlacement of barbecue grill (personally owned by the tenant) in front of the apartment unit- fire hazard Light fixtures (interior) must be change, must be uniform- existing lights have combination of white and yellowEven if the bathroom and kitchen area looks fine, it needs cleaning (TLC)Mismatched appliances (refrigerator white in color while the oven is color black) - small details make a huge difference.

It's how you go for $2.5MM to $4MM to $9MM to $35MM to well over $800MM in appropriate years.

The purpose of this district is to support the rehabilitationand/or redevelopment of underutilized commercially zoned areas in the City wheretraditional business district zoning is inappropriate or unsuccessful.

Did you just buy a bad deal, did you severely underestimate rehab expenses, did you overestimate ARV, was the work poorly done, was the flip inappropriate for the area, or was it maybe just poorly staged and/or marketed?

(AKA: There was a legitimate reason to prove we did a renovation)(Even then, we didn't give receipts)In Georgia, asking for receipts in this situation would be inappropriate and laughed at.

not trying to pull anything inappropriate here, but I am weighing whether it would be worth the increased payroll costs to recharacterize more of the business income as w2 wages vs pass through income, as qualification standards seem much simpler for w2 wage earners vs schedule c business owners.

Forgive me if that is inappropriate.

Borrowing from a 401k should be a last resort and is an inappropriate action 9 times out of 10.

I should probably be downvoted for saying this, but the reality is in most (if not all states) the courts are really looking for violations to security deposits, inappropriate living conditions, illegal stacking.  

They have the right to evict home owners for anything they deem inappropriate.