
2 July 2008 | 43 replies
As is too often the case, most investors only look at the ca$h involved today, not the real, long-term, value of a given product or service.When talking about "Buyer's Agent" and "Seller's Agent", the key word is "Agent"...as in the laws of agency and how they apply in your state, and in your transaction.In MOST states, ALL agents in a transaction are working for the Seller, absent any written Buyer's Agency Agreement.

9 July 2008 | 163 replies
If that's the case, it isn't relevant to the new landlords on this forum, unless they are starting with hundreds of units.Wait a sec, Mike...I hate to use logic in a debate, but...You said in an earlier post that the more units owned, the *more* likely the trends would be towards the average.Above you say that the more units owned, the *less* likely the trends would be towards the average.Yes, I realize you were speaking of two different phenomena (law of large numbers vs economies of scale), but you can't argue both sides in the same argument, which you clearly are.So, which is it?

29 June 2008 | 15 replies
Assuming that maintenance and repairs will cost 20% of gross rents (I believe this number to be way north of what it will actually cost) we arrive at $1,015 for maintenance and repairs.I will also have an extra $2,000 in a revolving CD ladder as a slush fund to fix whatever Murphy's Law throws at me.So:Gross rents: $5,076Taxes: $701Insurance: $766Debt service: $2520Maintenance and repairs: $1,015Cash Flow: $74I realize this will be basically a wash as far as cash flow for the first year, but I think I have all my bases covered as far as projecting what expenses will be.

12 January 2010 | 23 replies
A member that finds a buyer or a seller for his company is not in violation of law.

19 August 2008 | 60 replies
There is no law that says that your brain has to shut down when you graduate.

3 July 2008 | 11 replies
Generally speaking, that would be a violation of fair housing laws, and land you in trouble rather quickly.

15 August 2008 | 4 replies
That may be dictated by state law.

13 July 2008 | 7 replies
I was informed today from a renter who was living in a foreclosed home and evicted within 30 days, stated that there is a new law which allows renters of foreclosed homes to be evicted in 60 days now.

29 July 2008 | 11 replies
Reason why is there could be multiple answer for that question, the answer depends on what are the state law in regards to Foreclosure.

18 July 2008 | 5 replies
I especially like the $25 email fee I have seen on some of my Chicago closings.When I have seen that fee, I have paused the closing and told the closer to get that off the HUD or we ain't closing.Here is the key, by LAW you are supposed be able to review the HUD prior to settlement.