This has the same effect of compensating you, but you need to make it evident to your investors that part of your contribution to the deal is the discounted price you accepted for your land.• You contribute your land to the project as your equity into the project.  

If something pops up later, like fraud, the contract can become evidence of the intent of the parties.I think your studies have brought you to a level of being a danger to yourself and others.

If I choose 'Individualized Assessment', can't I ignore all the items in the Inclusive screening criteria (Can't use credit score, can't use eviction depending on when, can't use criminal records depending on when, etc) and just use what I have been normally using (Credit score of 650, no evictions, no criminal record, etc) WITH THE EXCEPTION of allowing the applicant to provide supplemental evidence as to why I should consider them as a tenant.

If your proof that he was a rock star realtor is in his self-written bio, that's a pretty weak piece of evidence. 

Evidently, he was interested in contrasting views and that was what he got.

Accepting some and not others, you will ultimately be challenged by someone claiming descrimination against a protected class, and your acceptance of another and not them is just evidence that you're real reason is something else.It'll happen.

Hence you either need to get started now so you can show evidence in 2-3 years or you need to find/create W-2 income.You might make more money focusing on great deals and just accept that the higher interest rate is what happens when you have more time on your hands.

This is further evidence that the halted unemployment stimulus was a driving factor.

Without increasing your purchase price and waiving contingencies, the next best thing would probably be to have documented evidence that you have the financial capacity to close, and the ability to close quickly.

It is flat out dumb and thoughtless.One last piece of evidence?