data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54856/548564123ad755298633082c9808829bc8f478a3" alt=""
31 March 2007 | 3 replies
Check the filters and see that they are promptly replaced if dirty and tenants are notified they are not maintaining the equipment properly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78516/785169e4558c7fd73a54d326baff26d168a5071d" alt=""
12 February 2009 | 8 replies
I have read Ron LeGrands books and he uses 70% as well...just not real sure why...Also, is it safe to say that someone could sell their house for 70% below MV?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81ec/c81ec4ebd5ace6f5453aa21f5cef388f7a403a93" alt=""
9 March 2007 | 3 replies
I kinda have done a rehab, me and my ex-wife bought her parents house, for well below market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ebfc/3ebfc369e4eea808e64ea2f138601d7054c02355" alt=""
7 March 2007 | 1 reply
Cut the stack off several feet above the highest drain and replace everything below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcc62/fcc62ef973480851e7f902cfe838948f37035be0" alt=""
8 March 2007 | 6 replies
Being somewhat of a newbie, I'm taking full advantage of asking some embarrassing questions... just like the one below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3c11/a3c11a623a6c7d80898fd343b5d927666457f512" alt=""
20 December 2008 | 9 replies
I've read a lot of posts on this board from people who were really worried about the high capital gains tax (it's only 15%, could be lower-and I realize you'll have some CA tax on top of that), only to realize that their GAIN was all that was taxed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65ca7/65ca7edd1c2c223309238c1ceabcdc73555d28bb" alt=""
13 April 2007 | 23 replies
So, if it isn't a good time for a beginner to get in, it's not because the people with ongoing projects are performing below par.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/789a7/789a79a7cb24c22bdede25e5c7225d65b7a1dae1" alt=""
13 December 2007 | 13 replies
The average person is way below average.2.
18 March 2007 | 6 replies
that may be true.but as an INVESTOR, what you're looking for is these same houses (maybe a bit more beaten up) that have lazy, absent, distressed owners - now you're talking a real reduction in price (and possibly value) of say 25 to 40k...now we're at 60kyou increase the value by making the improvements the former owner could/would not and selling it at a price below the others - say for this example comp'd houses list at 95k - you're selling for 89k for a 20k profit!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87268/8726844babe6e1e88e7bc38e203a71822f90bfd1" alt=""
18 March 2007 | 5 replies
People are now taking notice that if the property is selling below tax assessed value, that is considered a good buy or at least they think so.