
9 April 2015 | 7 replies
The ARV for that area is 75K and it could rent for 1K a month.I would like to either 1) wholesale the property 2) flip it or 3) rent the property (my least preferred exit strategy).
9 April 2015 | 2 replies
Im sure weve all seen signs around like "we buy houses fast, cash" or "we buy ugly houses," preferably the small cheap throwaway signs on freeway off-ramps etc How well does this work?

12 April 2015 | 8 replies
If you buy a t a big enough discount like Bill Gulley suggests it doesn't matter.Bill, I am curious how you prefer to source notes with significant discounts and what the yield is based on the coupon and your discounted price.

6 November 2015 | 48 replies
I did not make anything as all the proceeds went to years of preferred returns.It was not fun losing all of these properties but there was a lot to learn from it.

18 May 2016 | 1 reply
I would prefer working with someone local to Nashville, TN, but am open to working with a remote adviser as well.

10 May 2016 | 2 replies
I am trying to analyze Single Family Homes (SFH) in the Aurora / Naperville, IL area, for potential buy-and-hold rental properties.Does anyone out there have a calculator or template that they prefer using?

5 December 2016 | 5 replies
I am trying to analyze Single Family Homes (SFH) in the Aurora / Naperville, IL area, for potential buy-and-hold rental properties.Does anyone out there have a calculator or template that they prefer using?

10 May 2016 | 1 reply
I am trying to analyze Single Family Homes (SFH) in the Aurora / Naperville, IL area, for potential buy-and-hold rental properties.Does anyone out there have a calculator or template that they prefer using?

13 May 2016 | 14 replies
This was my personal preference as I learn one way and you might learn a different way.

11 June 2016 | 9 replies
my experience is that they dont like LOC's north of $500K, and really prefer $300K, But most banks would be happy to give you 70-80% LTV portfolio loan, the banks dont like LOC's secured against real estate, because it ties up twice you available, so if you have a $300K line with no balance, the bank need $600K on hand to cover you, that becomes a liability to them, but if the give you $300K and amm it, its backed by the asset, so the bank doesnt need cash on hand to cover you, now you are an asset giving them a return on the investment they made. at least thats how it was explained to me