But, if you're doing it for practice then approach the seller, explain you have some investor buyer and decided you don't want to hold the property and that you'll pass it on to your buyer.

In practice, I have been doing both (1) and (2), and attorney is comfortable with (2), though I know that Bill doesn't like the approach, and he makes some good points.

Thanks, Paul @Paul C,As a practicality.

@joel owens I have not ventured much in the HML practice yet.

No living in a home being practically gutted for 3 months, no $30K commission fees, no showing the home every weekend, QUICK.

The snow removal ordinances I see don't expect any snow removal during a storm because they are all phrased in this way.As a practical matter I try to do several snow removals for really big snowfalls (a foot or more) and I advise my tenants to do the same.

These strategies, if properly tested, can produce very good projections with, in practice, very low risk and high return (e.g. more than 10,000% pre-tax return with max drawdown less than 10% for the last ten years).

For supplied appliances, Landlord will work to correct any dysfunction as quickly as is practicable.

One point you made is that lending practices change in January...

This is poor practice on their part.