![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/69107/small_1621414191-avatar-dmelka.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 January 2014 | 6 replies
Carolina is rightThere are lot of benefits to being a licensed agent/investor.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/179032/small_1640549046-avatar-cee440.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 January 2014 | 11 replies
And you get the benefit of having 50 past ones to catch up on.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/179438/small_1621422515-avatar-_focusedchild.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 January 2014 | 6 replies
The license will benefit you once you've built a network and have the capital and credit to buy properties.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/168561/small_1621420976-avatar-kahdallas.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 January 2014 | 8 replies
A good GC should also be almost cost neutral but provide the benefits of extensive project management experience.If you feel your project management skills are able to handle project, I would say go for it.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/179391/small_1621422508-avatar-brianch.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 January 2014 | 7 replies
And you get the benefit of having 50 past ones to catch up on.Two Great reads, I bought both J.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/104411/small_1621417228-avatar-ag89.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 January 2014 | 5 replies
Trey your on the right track but you should be able to reap the benefits and limit your liability as well.In CA, we have this form below that basically tells a seller that you are not representing them and they should seek legal,tax,etc. counsel if they need it.http://www.wrightrealtors.com/pdf/non_agency.pdfThe good thing about TX, is that the laws are much different and the disclosure requirements are much less.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/145149/small_1621419283-avatar-wendelld6.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 January 2014 | 5 replies
Additionally, I don't see the benefit of selling the loan to begin with for the mortgagee.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/66021/small_1621413758-avatar-djdietz.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 January 2014 | 4 replies
Hello,I am in the very early stages of talking to a couple of different property owners about the possibility of buying their existing rental properties and them carrying part of the total purchase price as a 'second note' (assuming other lenders would only want to lend in the first position.These properties range from 6 to 8 units owned free and clear, a 6 unit with about a 40% LTV loan on it, and some single families that range from free and clear to 80% LTV loans.These could be done in a SDIRA, or not, depending on the benefits to each way.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/179595/small_1689462798-avatar-jmex3.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 January 2014 | 4 replies
He made a large investment that flopped a bit ago along with a divorce etc things got messy, the goal is to create equity so he can buy his own warehouse so as as I build properties when he positions himself in better financial position (2-3 years) he'll start buying properties off of me and my goal is to purchase more properties with the money I receive from him.Being that it is a family company and I am the oldest I am next to take over the company when and if my dad decides to retire (which I doubt he ever will, he's a workaholic) but I see it benefiting everyone involved.Again I could be wrong but I feel like I have the right people behind me and I know the employees would be open to this let's say that of the 43% that said yes 10-15% actually are serious about it that will give me enough to fill the two homes.The super point is a good one, I may have to put more thought into that one.Again, thank you.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/83796/small_1666118083-avatar-ukefuture.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 January 2014 | 12 replies
In recent years Congress enacted two amendments to Section 121 in order to limit the benefits of Section 121 when the property has been used as a rental.First, if you acquire property in a 1031 exchange and then convert it to your primary residence, you must own it at least five years before being eligible for the Section 121 exclusion.Second, the amount of gain that you can exclude will be reduced to the extent that the house was used for something other than a primary residence during the period of ownership.