or maybe bank wouldn't mind taking a loss since it is a liability on their books and the location isn't exactly too desirable?

If she were hitting my desired bench marks I'm sure she'd be working 40 hrs per week.- I'd like for her to do 4 acquisitions per month.

Just graduated and was renting for a year before we stumbled across a deal on a REO house just 5 mins away in a very desirable part of town.

While the global economy continues to view the U.S. as the leader in monetary exchange, there will be a desire to view the USD as a safety net.

Tiny homes, container homes, Airstreams ... they're all pretty cool and desirable, in my opinion.

Until then here's an article:http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9223400Second question: Bottom line is, your going to pay for desirable areas.

The least desirable houses will always fill last, and cannot attract more tenants by lowering their pricing.

Especially on a property that was desirable enough to secure a cash back up.

The increased desirability of the area will surely increase property values, however with a flood of new residences available, who is to say that the increased supply available won't stymie the appreciation that could be experienced. 

There are a lot of people on BP who seem to have no desire to ever accelerate their mortgages...why would they if they're locked in at a historic low rate...all they have to do is patiently wait and a tenant will pay it off for them over time?