I literally implement based on that.I manage the properties but hire "tool belt" level repairs.I have been onsite for projects in order to provide guidance to the workers and answer questions about how I'd like the repair done.I have held the stupid end of a tape measure.I have held the end of a board, but not used the power tools.This interpretation was reinforced by a (former?)

If you have a habitational real estate portfolio I highly recommend that you dive into your current coverage forms with a Broker, or Consultant to better understand how your "risk" is interpreted by the insurance carriers.

What is fascinating to me is that the city council and mayor somehow interprets the data differently than realtors and folks actually in the real estate industry.

You need to interpret the report, call landlord references and verify employment. 

I don’t agree to this but it is my interpretation of the rules.  

My strategy with "stopping by" is that the medium of email is oftentimes interpreted in the perception of the reader, not the sender. 

Is my interpretation correct ?

I’m glad I’m not the only one who interpreted it that way.  

I've never been "burned" but I guess that can be open to interpretation on what burned means.

Each inspector is different, many are good, but some are not and each has their own interpretation of the code.