Your influence is asserted mostly when you tell the agent what it's worth.

The big question here is what claim could your husband's ex plausibly assert against your separate assets (assuming they truly are separate and no fraudulent conveyances have been made to make them so) unless local law? 

While I respect the fact that perhaps you don't feel that turnkey is the investment niche for you, I'd like to take this opportunity to set the record straight on a couple of the assertions you made in your post regarding the numbers we run at Spartan Invest.1.

Best of luck as you assertively do your best to take control of overhead costs!

I’m angry at myself for not doing the mental math, and angry at my agent for missing the dang bedroom, and angry at myself for leaning on my agent because I was too afraid to assert myself.Now, when I walk past that rehabbed house, which sold again this February for $235,000, my heart still races.

With the new year, I'm trying to be more aggressive, active, and assertive both in both areas.

Further, you assert that ¨properties would naturally merge towards each other and their values would be in equilibrium as enough time passed since redlining practices¨ suggesting the free market has largely eliminated the race-based effects on home values as of today.

The company can deny any claim you make based on the assertion that it was a pre-existing problem.

I have more control over the acquisition price and want to heed the advice of BP contributors everywhere who assert that “investors make their money when they buy the property and realize it when they sell.”

Might be something to also look into.Bob E. is totally on point with many of his assertions.