![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/949419/small_1621506096-avatar-adrianc52.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 January 2023 | 10 replies
The Supreme Court is more conservative.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/261855/small_1621437118-avatar-durrrell.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
9 August 2016 | 10 replies
This is of course unconstitutional as the Northeast circuit court ruled and now the fight is in the Ohio Supreme Court to rule it throughout Ohio.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1052851/small_1621508136-avatar-tysonb10.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 July 2023 | 9 replies
Put more eloquently, the Alabama Supreme Court said, “Though ordinarily there exists a presumption that one does not intend to abandon his property, this presumption is not attendant where the article claimed to have been abandoned is generally considered valueless.”[1] Photographic evidence that the contents of a tax sale property were all damaged, heavily soiled, or not worth the cost to haul to the dump, would seem to indicate “valueless” abandoned property.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/698921/small_1621495680-avatar-scottd70.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
9 February 2017 | 1 reply
A few years back Maryland lost a case in the Supreme Court because they did not allow a credit against county/city income taxes for taxpayers with out of state income.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/924773/small_1697463165-avatar-robbrealtor.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 July 2020 | 2 replies
Pursuant to the most recent Kentucky Supreme Court Order, evictions for non-CARES Act properties, including non-payment of rent, start August 1, 2020.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/57139/small_1660933775-avatar-1marcus.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 February 2020 | 2 replies
Basic characteristics of value:Demand – there must be a demand for the item and the purchasing power to acquire it• Utility – the item must be needed or wanted• Scarcity – there must be a limited supply• Transferability – the item must be able to be sold ownership rights must be transferableI guess the demand reign supreme when we determine the value.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1783718/small_1694789516-avatar-juanp145.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 June 2020 | 25 replies
There was a UK Supreme Court case a few years ago to address the situation of a UK tax payer with a Delaware structure who was getting taxed TWICE (meaning in both countries) on the same income.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1243584/small_1621510604-avatar-austinb121.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 June 2023 | 33 replies
If you don't know who Jerryll is, as "Supreme Overlord" of REI SEO and lead development, that's a you thing Aaron, not a Jerryll legitimacy thing.Or to be blunt about it, it's just showing your lack of experience/ knowledge in REI industry.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/642758/small_1621494493-avatar-pratish.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
16 November 2016 | 11 replies
California is aggressive in pursuing former residents highlighted in a case which was recently contested in the supreme court.http://www.taxabletalk.com/tag/gilberthyatt/The challenge I think you have is that you would need to prove to the state that you changed your domicile.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/880359/small_1621504894-avatar-thomasj60.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 January 2019 | 87 replies
So basically we are where we were before 199A, with sifting through the grey matter when trying to define a trade or business under 162 which doesn't define it clearly itself... but per the Supreme Court in Groetzinger, 480 U.S. 23, 35 (1987), said, “We accept the fact that to be engaged in a trade or business, the taxpayer must be involved in the activity with continuity and regularity and that the taxpayer’s primary purpose for engaging in the activity must be for income or profit.”