Secondly, there is the issue of significant restrictions on being able to identify the property you're rolling the profit of the sale into.

I have learned to identify which probate cases have real property attached to them.

I actually used a combination of those to find the HOA.What I did was go to Google Maps - I couldn't get the street view of the house because the google car can't drive through the gated community - so I used the little yellow man to identify where the street view would be for the front gates of the community.

Who is your real target market, might identify them and change if you're seeking the same population.

I know to stay away from the real rundown areas which should be easy to identify and I will probably be using some kind of consultant to pick an area to live in, nothing fancy or terribly expensive just some place clean and safe enough to live and work from.

I have identified what i believe to be the two primary risk factors.

I love the way she explains identifying properties. 

Identify the problem, make your offer on your numbers, make sure you do your DD and hope the sellers are frustrated and will take whatever you offer.

It takes some financial planning to identify the best opportunity. :) 

What’s more, since the decision includes extensive discussion about the many factors that should be considered when looking at a disparate impact claim, the court appears sensitive to the kinds of concerns that were identified by real estate professionals in a working group NAR created several years ago to look at the disparate impact issue.In that group, two main concerns were identified: that real estate professionals and others not be held liable for actions if they had no reasonable way of knowing that a disparate impact would be the outcome, and that real estate professionals not be expected to do extensive research into the possible disparate impact of their actions.