
16 November 2011 | 15 replies
Maybe a signed agreement of sale to purchase will satisfy utility companies that have this policy - I'm not certain of that though.

18 November 2011 | 17 replies
A policy for the appraisal value should in theory do that.

18 November 2011 | 5 replies
My question is, is the mortgage policy basically title insurance for the lender?

19 November 2011 | 9 replies
Most turn key sellers these days advertise zero for all of these items.

17 November 2011 | 8 replies
If you did notice and just didn't mention it to anyone, take this as a lesson that honesty is the best policy.

26 November 2011 | 50 replies
Each investor has a different risk tolerance level and it is up to us as a company helping them to mitigate that risk and give them the pertinent data so that they make an informed decision.

20 November 2011 | 12 replies
Regarding point 4....what does your co-insurance clause in your policies say?

30 January 2012 | 39 replies
We go in with zero contingencies.If you are serious about the property why not put the $$ in the EMD?

21 November 2011 | 7 replies
If you do then question for you, is how high is your tolerance for risk into the deal?

9 December 2011 | 2 replies
We are far more comfortable with the process of FCL than you might be and our number is zero outside of the above.