Because all of the LEGAL information is correct and because we insure on the LEGAL, nothing needs to be changed.Should we worry about this discrepancy?

Can someone please help me I went on the tools section and did the rental analysis the rental analysis said cash flow of $736 then scroll down to the bottom the 50% rule says $326 why is there a discrepancy between the 50% and rental analyst which one should I believe

To de lead a wall, you’d have to remove the plaster, which is like removing a swimming pool with a hammer and throwing it away, then you’ll find discrepancies in insulation, termites, electric and framing.

The appraisal came at value but for some reason (finding discrepancy in rent info between listing and seller's disclosures), I decided not to remove my contingencies and cancel the contract.

My wife and I are under contract for a home in the Houston area. We made an offer 25k over list as the Houston market is insane and houses are getting many offers within a day. Everything was on track. Inspection went...

I compared the rent estimate from Zillow and the current rental listing, and observed strong discrepancy (listing > Zillow estimate).

By that thinking, a better algorithm could help solve for discrepancies in the variations of appraised values.

Conventional commercial lenders usually won't go for this especially that large of a seller carry and the property still needs to debt service like one of the other posters mentioned, which I don't know if you'd be able to as value vs. cash flow in CA (Assuming the property is in CA) is going likely be a large discrepancy. 

This helps with consistency, as well helping to eliminate discrepancies after the tenant vacates.

9/10 times they are pulling information from public records and previous sales which is why there are sometimes discrepancies in the pricing, square footage, lot size, etc.