One has a great credit score, one has a rich father (Doctor) who pays his rent no matter what, and two have zero credit history, and both have erratic or very recent job hires.I've already rejected one of the four due to no credit history and too short of job history, and the fact that the guy doesn't respond when I asked for follow up info. 

Kristine Marie PoeThe landlord doesn't need a translator so much as an interpreter (someone like Marcia) to facilitate communication with the prospective tenants.Here, while we are required to provide our lease and documentation only in English or French (the official languages), we cannot reject a candidate simple because s/he does not have a fluent command of either language.  

They reject you not you rejecting them.  

They might reject the lease offer, but it helps you. 

Here in SF tenants are legally allowed to sublease to anyone per the landlord's written approval(no matter what you say in the lease) and the lack of creditworthiness is not an allowed reason to reject a sub-tenant.

Applicants are a dime a dozen you just keep looking till you find the one without red flags.When I screen applicants I do it with the goal of finding reasons to reject their application.

If I will have to reject her.

Any applicant that tries to negotiate is a potential red flag and should be rejected.

If this is a renewal lease, electronic payments will begin on the first month of the lease and will continue each month and end on last month of the lease.To avoid Non-Sufficient Funds (NSF) return/rejection, available and unrestricted funds must be in the Tenant's bank account on the first day of each month.

I would reject them.