And most firms will run a free feasibility study to scope it for you.

What you are proposing is not feasible.

I'm considering multiple strategies including:- Buying a primary residence in the Bay Area (difficult due to extremely high prices, possibly renting rooms after required interim period)- Buying a rental investment property in CA where it is cheaper, and cash flow is more feasible (e.g.

@Bruce WoodruffI meant Solar roofing on top of existing not sure if that's feasible

I'd like to spend a lot of time looking at potential properties and that's not super feasible if I have to fly somewhere.

At this point it would be used for property flipping...when I think of timely bidding, paying contractors and purchasing materials I'm just not sure having the third party intervention is a feasible approach with this type of venue.

The best route, if feasible, would be a straight run through an outside wall. 

You need to spend time comping rentals and viewing to see if its feasible.

It just wouldn't be feasible for me to try to maintain good proper occupancy levels and enforce leases from afar, and it costs less to have a manager in place than to constantly be flying back and forth.

ok i read and understood most of this thread but i have questions. so if a bank or any corporation exist merely for profit, and calling a DOS is legal and feasible, then why wouldnt banks sell the violators of the DOS clauses properties off?