
26 June 2007 | 15 replies
Checking the minutes is a good start but the absence of issues ini the minutes does not mean there are no deferred maintenance issues.John CoreyI would guess that an outsider would not be permitted to inspect the common areas, except visually.
4 July 2007 | 9 replies
I guess that is a touchy subject.

26 June 2007 | 6 replies
Jon,I guess you have to consider what your time is worth.

6 September 2007 | 13 replies
They charged me 214.00 total.I guess Ill bend over for packet 8 now too, being their the only ones who can port the sunrocket number over, without having to change it.

31 July 2007 | 9 replies
Now I guess I could say "to make me feel better, I'm going to put down $1 earnest money" but the bottom line is that, legally, I don't have to put anything down as earnest money to make the contract valid and binding.

9 December 2011 | 15 replies
I guess I was "getting ready to get ready" like someone else said before.

29 July 2007 | 4 replies
I guess I just wanted to invite you in to the forums.

25 July 2007 | 5 replies
I guess I used a bad choice of words with the "quit your day job" deal.

8 August 2007 | 10 replies
If someone gets hurt on the property minutes after the f/c sale, guess who's responsible.

12 August 2012 | 11 replies
i guess the way i view land trust's is that it is an excellent benefit for person who wants to purchase, but can't right now in the traditional way.they get to work on strengthening their credit, plus they get the write offs. it would seem to make the chances better that they will perform with the eventual outright purchase, versus a straight lease option.i haven't done one yet, but i just closed on a deal where i am going to set one up. so, until i've actually set one up and than closed on the sale, i won't know for sure. jim