He's doing exactly what you're doing, but his members get his opinion on the future outcome of sporti9ng events.

It looks like your post is tagged for Seattle--if you're hoping for some more Tennessee connections, it could be worth re-posting with a Tennessee tag. - Have you identified the next few steps, or are you looking for some help figuring out what's next?

I've found having clear flowcharts and processes for the business creates a high level of success and less failures in the future.

In my opinion, your best bet at this point is to remove the listing for a few weeks and re-list it as a new listing with updated photos, new write-up, upstairs staging and minor repairs as others suggested.

This makes a good case for smaller test for any future changes. 

I put 15% down for our deal, and it gives us more flexibility for the future- The template for the Contract for Deed is the general Contract for Deed for the state of MN (where I reside) - We are getting title insurance and ordered a title commitment to confirm there are no liens or claims on the property I feel like I've educated myself on different seller financing, and understand Contract for Deed protects the seller more than the buyer, so I understand why the seller is going that route, especially if selling Contract for Deeds is how they do their business.

Vendors keep working with the promise that they will get made whole at some point in the near future with a sale, or debt restructuring.

However, it will likely lower future cash flow so it is a time-value of money play (and perhaps income tax bracket matching... ie, big deduction during a one-off big income year).Two properties... one with cost seg and one with out will have the same depreciation taken at the end of its life (27.5 or 39.0 years).Also keep in mind that STR usually requires 39.0 years of depreciation for the primary building asset.

Get in the habit of looking at and inspecting what's happening re listings and sales in your local area. 

It would be great if progressive views/laws on reducing minimum square footage (residential/single family on foundation) were indeed the case in Indiana, and will to catch on (re-evaluating minimum size of homes) elsewhere.