When I had my first listening session I noticed the following mistakes made by my team: they did not follow our script, they did not follow the sellers objections, they are not building rapport with the seller, etc.My plan is to let the team listen to the recorded calls first and see if they can point out their own mistakes themselves.

I suppose for tax purpose the homestead designation will move to the new 4plex (no objections) but will this new loan trigger any adverse charges, events or repercussions if any, or even to wife's loan from current lender or from any other entity?

However, I think a much more important question is whether they object to doing a background and credit check on the wife and having her sign the lease?

Currently pre-approved for much less than what you present here.Relative to this deal as objectively as perhaps possible:1.

The renters consented without any objection.

I feel like I keep getting chased by the shiny object of more cash flow, but what we really need is more (healthy) leverage like a HELOC to help us keep the ball rolling.Thanks again!

Before you can really know what your options are, you have to find exactly what you’re looking for and don’t get distracted by the next “shiny object” opportunity.

My guess is that it is objectively better to take the credit and be $10,600 closer to reinvesting in the next property.

But if a specialist can treat the material every time than it must not be a too big of an issue?

Yes, cash flow was an objective, but the greater objective was to learn what to pay attention to when considering tenants and investments.How did you find this deal and how did you negotiate it?