@Bridget Smith-Osbourne It is inappropriate to issue a 1099 to a shareholder (or owner) of a S Corporation for services rendered.

Its not a violation to refuse to rent to someone based on having tattoos....or bolts sticking through your tongue, or pants 10 sizes too big, or a trashy looking car, or inappropriate dress, etc, etc, etc.

Today, I think that the wrong approach.My preferred approach is to never feign syrupy condolence (because it comes across as insincerely and inappropriate from a stranger).

Properties that are inappropriately priced.

you meant, mogul, comes to us from the Mughal Empire...which was founded by a branch of the Mongols, so it's not entirely inappropriate.

I have never heard of a lender selling REO with a quit cliam, that is inappropriate.

I would prefer to not broadcast other sites here and it's likely inappropriate. 

But consideration is key, because it is equally inappropriate to completely out-dress your clients as much as it is unprofessional to show up in PJ's and slippers.Luxury brands are created for the middle class to appear wealthy.

The "sex offender" craze has a lot of people on the list for some inappropriate but hardly child threatening offenses.

It's just the behaviour one has, if one shows up with a very expensive car and want's them to see it (to show off), then that would be very inappropriate.