But, that won't ever change, that's a social matter.My guess is that on a % basis, the 47% pay more in taxes than 14.1%.Karen, thank you for your offer to assist me with my voting obligation but here we have a split system, Dems vote on Nov 7th and Reps vote on Nov 9th.

(I don't waste much time on credit anymore since many, many people have bad credit.)I guess I'll offer a countervailing opinion.

I guess the majority of the public believes the status quo is OK.I don't believe it's OK but, beyond casting a vote or making a protest card, I don't know how to change things effectively.

Kind of funny how close bill's guess was!

My guess is the market for 7 BR houses is pretty small.

He did say he would send me referrals so I guess it's not all bad.

I'm guessing there wasn't excessive damage?

Ha never mind I guess it does it automatically

Plus I can say anyone can technically force dissolution at any time (since the Act I mentioned makes it so anyway) but I guess we will each just acknowledge the fact that such dissolution will cause some headache over appraisal and legal fees - and therefore we prefer to stick to the 4 year plan.By the way, how do you get a fair appraisal in the case of dissolution?

(there are several here, unlike the city we moved from) So I guess the answer is, dig in, learn EVERYTHING you can about the type of property you want to invest in, and about the area; and do a lot of homework!