Does the property look like someone's on the ball, or is it falling into a state of disrepair?

@Wayne BrooksMy biggest fear is I close and somehow wholesaler #2 exercises their legal right to purchase and the property gets snatched from me 

It's not exact by any means buy should put you in the ball park.

Just for ball park in my area I run around a 32-35% expense ratio.

Now here is were i will say the PM dropped the ball.1. the gas should have been on and pilot lit before the tenant moved in, if it was just rehabbed it should have been turned on to test and made sure it was working properly, or if there was time in between, the gas should of been off which means the gas company would of had to come out and turn it on and light the boiler.2. the PM should have who ever is taking those service calls be able to walk through a few simple checks before calling a HVAC professional, I would not have the tenant light it, but if I know all that is needed is for it to be lit, I can send one of our handymen out at a much cheaper rate than the HVAC guy.  

I honestly don't think that the PawSox did much economically for the city. the average ball player was not living within city limits.

I've had some low ball offers but still for sale.  

But if someone out there has a lot of cash that isn't yielding them a return at all, and they exercise capitalism upon something they are willing to earn a smaller profit on than the local investors, that's a good buy for them where they can be competitive!

(Assuming it’s over a 10% increase it also requires a 60 day notice.)That way, the ball is in his court and he may choose to stay, which for you would actually be the better option because you’d get the higher rent and avoid all the costs typically associated with a vacancy (i.e. painting, repairs, paying for utilities while it’s vacant, etc).

I was thinking a 30% stake would be in the ball park since i do have experience and a track record of always have units full and have good margins and cash flows....