
17 April 2011 | 12 replies
ethnic oriented, due to its very nature (and we have tons of that here in So Cal)3. 7-Eleven anchored (single tenant), as I don't see the convenience store going away.

24 April 2011 | 2 replies
Even if it is a corporation the essential nature of the income is not changed either.

28 April 2011 | 34 replies
I'm naturally more friendly with my tenants which helps longevity but when people start to take advantage of you, you gotta see it and take the steps to evict or cut ties while minimizing your losses.

29 April 2011 | 13 replies
Natural Gas, certain agriculture plays, water purification companies.

4 May 2011 | 21 replies
Others aren't as direct, so interject my questions at natural points within our dialogue.I strongly agree with Rob: "It's not the house, it's the seller".

29 May 2011 | 3 replies
Your buyers will also know that you are flipping either a contract or property due to the nature of the transactions.

23 September 2015 | 45 replies
Are they required, under penalty of fine or prison, to fully disclose the nature of their transactions?

11 June 2011 | 4 replies
Naturally, you spend some of it and you save the rest.

16 June 2011 | 18 replies
Or, the building is cancerous.

13 June 2011 | 5 replies
However, I am just getting started, so we'll need to see.Anyone else seeing this split nature in low-middle income neighborhoods, with foreclosures at one level and arms-length transactions in others?