
9 March 2021 | 2 replies
Regarding the second topic:I am glad the Police is taking steps for supporting all victims in this aspect.”They didn’t answer this message.As you can see, there is no hope the Police changes the Policy 807 that supports this criminal activity in Baltimore City and no authority (aside of the two mentioned) seems to care.Regarding the electricity and the gas: after a lot of efforts (because the account was still in the name of the previous owner), I got them to cut the services off but the intruders continue having services in my house (I can see the lights are on at night).

15 March 2021 | 21 replies
Me personally, as an unlicensed agent taking my P n P course, I find it informative and the author is very knowledgeable about real estate.

20 April 2021 | 7 replies
We get secret shopped sometimes by the housing authority to make sure we are handling our applications correctly.

19 March 2021 | 11 replies
A federal judge in Cleveland has stated the federal government over reached its authority with the CDC eviction moratorium.

11 March 2021 | 2 replies
The author "Annie'' obviously writes more than she proof reads.

22 April 2021 | 10 replies
They can probably point you to the specific section of Code that limits their authority to commercial properties.
7 April 2021 | 13 replies
Just want to add that locales may be different so please check your local housing authority websites for what is legal and what is not re: evictions now!

29 July 2021 | 9 replies
The Anti-Eviction Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1, and the Summary Dispossession Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:18- 53, provide the following grounds for the removal of tenants that may constitute emergent circumstances justifying an LT trial:• Disorderly tenant (N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53(c) or 2A:18-61.1(b));• Willful or gross negligent damage to premises (N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53(c) or2A:18-61.1(c));• Abating housing or health code violations (landlord seeks to permanently board up or demolish premises because cited by authorities/inspectors for substantial health and safety of tenants) (N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1(g));• Occupancy as consideration of employment (N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1(m));• Offenses under comprehensive drug act (N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1(n));• Assaults or threats against landlord or certain other persons ((N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1(o));• Eviction for civil violations (tenant found by preponderance of evidence that theft of property, assault, terroristic threats against landlord or member of their family, employee of landlord’s, etc.)

15 March 2021 | 10 replies
After reading the post it appears to be something completely different.If a Section 8 inspector came into that property right now based on what you are saying, the inspector could very well hold up further payments from the housing authority until you fix the very things the tenant is talking about......and,,,,,if the eviction moratorium keeps getting dragged out you will NOT be able to evict them for non-payment.Brother you are going down a dangerous path and (potentially) giving landlords a bad name.No disrespect, but you need to do the right thing by your tenants and fix those things before they become disillsioned with you as the new owner and make things really difficult my man.Those are the sort of things that should have been addressed in the home inspection before you closed on the property and you should have had the previous owner take care of this beforehand.

17 September 2021 | 78 replies
An author on RE and economics I follow referred to Altos Research as he was reporting on inventory, and so I came across this video below by them.