Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago,

User Stats

9,999
Posts
18,560
Votes
Joe Splitrock
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Sioux Falls, SD
18,560
Votes |
9,999
Posts

Another Victory for Landlords on the Eviction Moratorium

Joe Splitrock
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Sioux Falls, SD
ModeratorPosted

A federal judge in Cleveland has stated the federal government over reached its authority with the CDC eviction moratorium. The judge stated the federal government cannot exercise power that congress has not given them. The judge basically rules that Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act cited by the CDC does not give them broad power. Ruling stated:

"The most natural and logical reading of the statute as a whole does not extend the CDC's power as far as the Defendant's maintain. Such a broad reading of the statute and the term other measures in particular, would authorize actions with few, if any, limitations - tantamount to a general federal police power. It would also implicate serious constitutional concerns, which the Plaintiff's did not raise here."

The relief under the Administrative Procedure Act:

"Because the court determines the Act is unambiguous and, by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium, CDC exceeded the authority Congress gave it in Section 361, the Court holds that the action is unlawful and sets it aside, as the APA requires."

The Plaintiff's received a declaratory judgement that determined the CDC exceeded its authority in the eviction moratorium. The court didn't go as far as granting an injunction on the CDC order. The wording implies the court didn't grant injunction because the Plaintiff didn't prove irreparable harm, because financial remedy was an option. It sounds like they are saying the Plaintiff could sue for financial relief. Maybe some lawyers on the forums could read the judgement and weigh in their opinions. Full text of the opinion and order:

https://drive.google.com/file/...

  • Joe Splitrock
  • Loading replies...