What kind of brain damage is in this for the risk for a hundred bucks a month?

Usually not, it's usually an order not to engage in some practice (might include any real estate activities) it will probably be some financial slam, like throwing out the obligation, it may include repayment of amounts paid and there could be other damages.

If you allow that dog to stay there as said the lawyer will eat you up.You can take a much larger deposit to cover for pit damage but again it's not just the damage it's the liability.

I prefer just to make the kill and leave the hauling, skinning, and dressing to the butchers.

You're essentially transferring responsibility for any damage under the old lease into the new one, too.

I've seen them try.I agree, the provision might be OK on the higher-end homes, but this post and all the comments really show the problems a provision like that can raise:http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/83336-what-kind-of-agreement-you-have-with-your-tenants-they-do-repairs-or-help-with-repairsI'm sure most of us have a section in our rental agreements that state tenants will be responsible for damage that they cause.

I work with a great deal of home builders, realtors and lenders turning around their clients with damaged credit.

The guarantee rents but what about damages and repairs?

I could have gone after him for monetary damages but you cant get blood from a stone and I do not want to waste my time pursuing something that isn't there.

For example, I have extensive fire damage to one room.