
29 January 2018 | 3 replies
Gain on the nonqualified use are not excludable under that 500k exclusion.Simple exampleYou bought a rental home on January 1, 2012, for $200,000.

29 October 2017 | 24 replies
I wasted hours and hours showing my house to kids that couldn't reach the railings, nervous parents carrying their kids up and down the steep stairs.I found myself trying to convey this fact without excluding anyone or discriminating.

7 January 2010 | 0 replies
If you have inexpensive properties there (Up to $25,000), please, e-mail me the list.Zip codes to EXCLUDE:35221, 35224, 35211, 35218, 35212, 35207, 35217. and 35205 if it's west to Hwy 65.

23 January 2018 | 15 replies
If it was your primary residence 2 of the last 5 years, you can exclude 250k (or 500k married) from capital gains.

3 July 2017 | 2 replies
The capital gain exclusion only applies to the time the property was your primary residence, so 9% of your capital gain due to appreciation will be allocated to primary residence use and the rest will be allocated to investment property use.This means that $675 ($7500 x 9%) can be excluded from capital gains (well within the $187.5K exclusion limit you calculated).

17 May 2022 | 2 replies
This does not exclude the resident from future obligations to pay the costs needed to repair the property.

6 June 2017 | 25 replies
They should provide swift, data-based answers and be willing to walk you through the real ROI math - not just the simplified website math that often excludes key expenses like vacancy and maintenance.

13 December 2016 | 1 reply
Here's a good article on insurance policies...in some regions where there is a proclivity to certain risks, the coverage may be limited or excluded altogether: http://homeownersinsuranceguide.flash.org/knowyour...The bottom-line is that one would have to check exclusions in their particular market.

29 June 2021 | 4 replies
If both were insured on the same policy, the policy wouldn't cover either of them as most policies exclude liability coverage for those insured under the same policy.
14 August 2017 | 11 replies
My Addressable Market (excluding bank owned REO and courthouse acquisitions) was defined roughly as: single family (type & use and land class fields) residential, built before 1978 (year built field), held by owner for 10 years or more (pkg date field) with assessed value under $125K (bldg AV and land AV fields), with out of town owners (owner city field and physical city field).