![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/588622/small_1621493250-avatar-jeffb122.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 September 2017 | 6 replies
However, this new buyer is threatening to get attorneys involved because he seems to think that this is not a encroachment granted in perpetuity.I think my folks are in the clear on this due to the nature of the language in the agreement but the last thing I want to have happen is get lawyers involved and have them have to pay to move the tank since, technically speaking, they are in the wrong.Don't have any experience/advice in this matter?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/694769/small_1621495605-avatar-nwr1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 September 2017 | 5 replies
It is the nature of the beast - we talk to Realtors using our own language.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/626814/small_1621494116-avatar-ryane34.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 September 2017 | 87 replies
That won't be until Nov or Dec.Swanny Thank you for taking the time for the detailed reply it is much appreciated Wow I have to be honest reading through that is like reading another language I have no clue what so much of that even means I started with a single family house bought with credit cards lol.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/238144/small_1621435387-avatar-tyrelltownsend.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 September 2017 | 14 replies
Lol well i guess so, it's a 3 unit building I figured that was the universal language for it.
12 October 2017 | 4 replies
The experience of being in a RE environment,, hearing the language and seeing business done is priceless.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/851850/small_1621504450-avatar-jefft84.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 September 2017 | 3 replies
So you do all the work and because of this additional language, if added, you get no commission?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/839479/small_1621504259-avatar-jordann19.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 September 2017 | 3 replies
Part of that is also 'speaking her language' when talking about the big picture (Ie.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/769774/small_1696413493-avatar-jwalden.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 October 2017 | 11 replies
(We use the documents from legal blanks, they have standard blanked language for these issues).Hope this helps - good luck!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/502536/small_1736920763-avatar-levithornton.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 September 2017 | 123 replies
It'll hopefully put more pressure on the debtor to get their rent paid knowing everyone else there see's they are obviously behind.If you boot it, I bet you could structure the lease language in a way that would require payment of the rent in full for the boot to come off, plus the boot fee, because like you suggested the parking would be the last item funds would be applied to.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/878067/small_1695412831-avatar-mikem2012.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 November 2018 | 3 replies
Again, keeping in mind that this is a small duplex, as the landlord I'd rather not pay an extra $40 a month for standalone internet/cellular service.Which leads me to my question -- insofar as the submetering system could function through a tenant's cable internet service, is there any legal prohibition on including language in a lease to require that a tenant maintain such internet service for the stated purpose of monthly water readings?