As many know the federal eviction moratorium ceased after a Supreme court ruling on August 26, 2021.

As the Supreme Court has noted, the ‘physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.’”

I would be supremely surprised if it was more than 20.

I signed up for the course offered by the supreme overlord of SEO - none other than Jerryll Noorden.

Of course, these are generally the people that have supreme confidence in themselves and their personal knowledge.I have said it before, and I will say it again-- A deal is different to everybody.

Doesn't that mean wholesaling could very well be legal in every state, but since it is cheaper to pay a fine/get licensed than take a case to either a state or the federal Supreme Court, case law could very well never be created to back up the theory the wholesaling is legal, and thus it becomes de facto illegal in most states?  

note that as recent as march of this year, charlie crist nominated an incredibly liberal justice to the supreme court. he had to choose between an incredibly conservative judge (lawson) and an incredibly liberal one (perry). he choose perry.also, in past campaigns, crist was pro-choice and now claims to be pro-life. he voted against a waiting period for abortions (while a legislator) and supports same sex unions.he's also forced through 3 executive orders that would reduce greenhouse emissions, require california-style carbon dioxide monitors on vehicles, and force appliances to meet certain energy standards. all of these were influenced by al gore directly.i dunno tim, do some reading up on crist and you'll see he's pretty liberal. liberal enough for fl liberals to not hate him and for conservatives to cry that he was elected.

Again, when a request/demand/ supreme demand is made by one party, the other party can accept, deny(and the contract remains in force), or negotiate.....I just can't see where this could possibly make a contract non enforceable.

Honestly ill pretend for a minute that the Director (excise and license) sits upon the Supreme Court Artifice of STR and was duly elected to interpret city regulations as law.

@Anastasia, the Supreme Court case was in 1988.