Have you ever had a pet cause more damage than the fees you've collected?

Would be useful as a landlord when the tenant moves in/out to reference for damage. 

For tax purposes, it's considered a reimbursement for property damage.

Ask the judge what criteria you have not fulfilled and if all is satisfied ask on record to have the eviction executed immediately and perhaps throw in a comment about failure to act providing damages.

Affordability is about 1:3So yeah on the surface it looks like a big difference, but there's a lot of things not controlled for in the stats- There were a crazy amount of houses built in the years just after the war, so housing stock was easy to come by everywhere;- Homes had nowhere near the kind of features they have now - 2 car garages, dishwashers, OTC microwaves, W/D hookups, high efficiency windows, central heat & air conditioning, etc - all those doodads and niceties drive up the cost of housing;- Fewer mortgages were 30 year, so homeowners had to pay (relatively) higher monthly payments;- Rentals were almost exclusively apartments, so there was more supply for buyers;ETCI think these things tend to be more stories that make for good press but aren't really that grounded in reality overall.

If mold remediation is done by a handyman without air sampling or post-remediation testing, it can lead to issues during the sale.

For a flip, you'll want to get a builder's risk policy, which covers the property during renovations, including any damage from fire, vandalism, or weather while it's vacant.

As Hurricane Helena went by, both of the roofs got damaged.

Here's how we screen:A bad tenant can lead to thousands of dollars of losses via unpaid rents, legal fees and property damages.

Unless it's obvious tenant damage you must fix things in the home.