With the 8,000 I should be able to lower my vacancy rate by a few percent and charge 50 a month more, adding a annual return increase of about 900, 75 monthly or 9% ROI on the 8k and less work on my end in vacancy issues.Let me know if that sounds more realistic or if that is a good idea in other peoples opinions.

Depending on the ARV, do i times it by 7 percent then multiple it by what my cut is, and do my cut have to be under a certain percentage.Sorry, for all the questions just been a little busy with my main job and really do not want to mess up.

I would rather buy a house for 200k at 4 percent,  than a 150k house at the more historically "normal" 7 percent.

There is no way that an investor can know 100 percent that a deal will not fail.

In the 2nd home which I bought about over a year ago and its rented has about 100k of Equity and this one I went in with 20 percent , nO cash flow but It pays Itself.

San Francisco has not had a 10 year period in my lifetime where home prices had not appreciated.   

. , I’ve heard most investors typically want a property that is 15 percent off the market value , if I find a seller who is willing to sell a house with 25 percent equity in it , is this a good deal I can wholesale?

@Peter Hassanzadeh I wrote a blog https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/11806/84376-your-letter-to-seniors-offer-them-something-they-care-aboutThis specifically shows Seniors, but would work with other lists like the Low Financial Stability Scores (FSS)Come from the standpoint of: Moving can be overwhelming to someone who has deferred maintenance and filled their house with a lifetime of possessions.and let them know; Selling your house can be easier than you think!

You’ll have success with this method 100 percent of the time

Other onerous provisions are as follows: Increases notice requirements for rental housing providers to renew, nonrenew, terminate a tenancy or increase the rent.Allows judges to stay the execution of an eviction for up to 1 year.Specifies that housing providers may only seek rent in an eviction action, excluding fees, charges and penalties.Prohibits housing providers from recovering attorney’s fees in default judgments.Places limitations on the requirement that the tenant in an eviction action must pay rent into escrow.Strengthens the rights of a tenant in an eviction action to affirmative defenses and counterclaims.Prohibits owners from evaluating an applicant’s prior rental history in the resident screening process.Caps application fees to $20.Caps late fees to $50 or 5 percent, whichever is less.Limits security deposits to 1 month’s rent.NAA is working with the affiliate network to push back against similar policies being proposed around the country.