Here are a couple of links regarding a Baltimore, MD landlord:http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/criminal/press/2011/murrell-cephus-07-19-11.pdfhttp://www.epa.gov/enforcement/criminal/press/2012/murrell-cephus-06-06-12.pdf

This can very frequently have legal implications stemming from : fines, suspension, criminal charges, etc.

NO simply not the best plan .. you have no control of who is occupying your house. could be 2 people, could be 20,, you can't screen for criminal, and even if company says ALL their workers are employed checked..

And even in the worst places, you can trust that casual criminals will make far less obvious trouble right next to the cops and make them look bad.There are multiple other reasons.

Criminals don’t care about rules/laws.

His policy is for every adult who will be living in his property to submit an application - which, upon their signature and submission, authorizes him to do background checks, criminal and rental history, credit check, etc.

I would push to have them charged because in some places (like my state) if they are convicted damages can be awarded as part of the criminal case and collected by the court system for you.

I would still want to run a background check for criminal and then request an additional 45%.  

I just checked the Criminal Report and it's tampered in the exact same way. 

Once you pass the state and federal exam and apply for your application (assuming that you don't have a criminal background that would hinder you) you will be licensed as a provisional broker.