
4 October 2018 | 11 replies
But in older areas with a lot of different styles it might not be so easy, so the agent would need to make adjustments.With the RPR analysis in hand, you can make your ARV assumptions based on the work needed.

13 October 2018 | 8 replies
This was done by making a few assumptions.1.

10 October 2018 | 12 replies
My assumption was that his share of the property was to remain in the SDIRA, as would the income until he was able to withdraw.Originally posted by @Alan Majors:Dmitriy,Am I right that revenue earned by the borrowed money is also taxable?

5 October 2018 | 29 replies
That's not much of an assumption over the $600 on the other side.

5 October 2018 | 6 replies
With that assumption (the number of your choosing), let's say that it's cash flowing...

5 October 2018 | 1 reply
Here are 2 assumptions I have made at this point; (1) I can get the house for $75K..not the $85K asking price and (2) that I can raise rents a minimum of $100 per unit.

14 October 2018 | 12 replies
The biggest factor was the underlying assumption on the market combined with the lending structures propping it up.

8 October 2018 | 4 replies
Assumptions can work in your favour in this case.

9 October 2018 | 6 replies
.- by the time I hit 70.5 and the RMD start kicking in, the balance could be close to or over $1m in the IRA meaning I could have an RMD of $75-$100k yr on top of my RE income, which, by then, will be sans the depreciation deductions, meaning HIGH TAX BILLS.My questions are this;- Is there a calculator that you can punch in your data and future assumptions and it gives you a recommendation or break even analysis.- Do you bite the bullet now or spread out over 2+ years- Do I just leave it and worry about it in 18 years or let the kids pay the tax when I die- 1st world problems, I know, but I don't want to pay more tax than I have to and I DO want to leave as much as I can to MY charities and heirs and not the Govt.Thanks for any suggestions or insight this great group of investors can offer.Tim

9 October 2018 | 5 replies
It's an assumption though, similar to the 1% rule or the 50% rule (expenses) which both have circumstances where it's not accurate.