data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/515d2/515d2fa18808019857622556bebd0345a091de19" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 2 replies
I think it speaks volumes regarding your care to the situation the heir is involved in.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deb48/deb486f7c6e8b535474c880a57475b5615dbf17e" alt=""
3 January 2025 | 7 replies
There are actually THREE kinds of subject to transactions1- subject to existing mortgage without lender approval2- subject to existing mortgage WITH lender approval3- subject to existing mortgage as part of a seller financed wrap around mortgage.with #1 and #3 it’s in everyone’s interest to utilize a third party servicer, who collects and then distributes payments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c2ba/7c2baea67a85792e4e4fce8ca5c14c7d7478b5c0" alt=""
17 January 2025 | 3 replies
The client can distribute proceeds through a private agreement without involving the title.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20472/2047273a0ba2a5cf5841c7bf2e4a869c0b684439" alt=""
11 January 2025 | 14 replies
Seems to be there was a bad judgement on the rehab from all parties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0487/a04878eeec254c887cadc064b57bf4a04cc8432c" alt=""
6 January 2025 | 38 replies
(Unfortunately, the investor fell for this gimmick and did NOT get their own 3rd party inspections, appraisals or even visit the properties they were buying, against our best efforts to encourage proper due diligence and follow our check list for their own protection.)So now some people are stuck with properties worth half what they paid (not all RWN members), with no renovation done, and constant repairs and vacancies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d72b5/d72b5ffc5ee2378995db632153a75a976bdf5b4d" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 8 replies
She's not going to have any leg to stand on in court if you get that far unless there's some explicit language prohibiting the owner from assigning responsibilities to another legally authorized party, and I'm guessing there isn't if another PM company was maintaining the lease and provisions - and the fact that the tenant was voluntarily working with the other PM confirms the acceptance of an authorized agent even if it's not explicitly stated, the same way if you accept rent from a tenant after a lease expires you imply acceptance of the lease terms continuing (which is why you should always have a holdover provision).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3503f/3503fad26a80606927a04b2685669b5752f109d9" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 8 replies
HI @Ananth SubramanianI have not been in your shoes but have read others that have and from what it sounds like getting the judgement is the easy part and physically collecting the $$ from the tenants is the hardest most impossible part. I
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f203/6f2039e8636ecc5b864e287321ea6b0155db0039" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 1 reply
This allows you to test all the systems and the people involved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9214/f92146259d7787b64163849ef2d5bfa507e30ae5" alt=""
22 January 2025 | 14 replies
It’s a balancing act of controlling costs while also controlling risk of personal injury to your tenants and property visitors as well as maintaining goodwill with all involved at the properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4c05/a4c05fbfcdeb2f67cd635f7d15a0e4a26ffe468a" alt=""
14 January 2025 | 9 replies
We are both 28 years old with zero experience prior to getting involved, she works for the business now and I work Blue Collar in the trades.