My tenant is very stable and there is no threat that she would move so that's a win.

There are dozens of tropical paradises that are just as nice or nicer, without the crowds, without the government regulation, without the threat of disasters, and with property for 1/4 - 1/2 the price.

You might have 8 months of collecting "profit" and then have one bad incident that demands all of that "profit" and drives you a couple thousand more into the red.On a property that's generating a healthy $500-$700+ profit a month, I'd either be driving it back into the property to fix any immediate cap ex threats or saving half for a future investment, and half for padding the emergency bank account

Your rental has a far greater threat of your tenant causing a fire than a tornado causing damage.

@Bjorn Ahlbladit is $100, so no big deal either way...I causally mentioned that I would take it off the refund, and tenant threats lawsuit, so got me triggered...But thank you for your inputs..

I would be more concerned about flooding than a tornado as that would be a great threat and more likely to happen.

Telehealth is a real threat to this segment of the market.

Whether it is recession or natural disasters, there is always a threat looming out there.

I think the "rates are so low this money is practically free" aspect of the market right now is pushing a lot of would-be-buyers into the field, even amidst the social distancing moves (interesting in itself).Investors seem to be on pause, tenants are TBD, and retail buyers (and most sellers, but the sellers are nervous nellies) are still hunting, but very unsure on how things will unfold.I know we've heard this idea discussed on the podcast before, but I think the biggest "threat" to performance of rentals across OKC is going to be from the Airbnb sector. 

I have a feeling that as the virus threat continues to shut down places of business and schools, people will be looking to get away for a while.