15 July 2024 | 5 replies
If there are potential consequences that will prevent her from making $ off of the other agents/assoc. brokers, she'll sign.All the best!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/3041330/small_1717524439-avatar-olivierc12.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 July 2024 | 7 replies
@Olivier Colson You will first want to find out if the locality has any “Just cause” regulations that prevent you from non renewal, or any other provisions that may keep a section 8 tenant in place.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2687988/small_1677874008-avatar-joef320.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 July 2024 | 6 replies
.), but larger ticket items that may require multiple bids, permits, or otherwise could have reasonably been prevented should be handled separately and charged to the owner.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/877216/small_1621504840-avatar-henryl50.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 July 2024 | 100 replies
Seller is free to tell his broker to limit inquiries to qualified (screened) buyers, as I mentioned above -- you assume that buyer with their own agents are qualified (pre-screened), but that doesn't prevent you from screening a buyer without a broker and IF he qualifies, have his sign a no agency agreement.So no, there is no "all/random" persons of inquiry.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2466248/small_1694566374-avatar-shireeny.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 July 2024 | 4 replies
There's nothing preventing the former owner from qualifying as the prospective owner-occupant as long as they meet the strict guidelines for being a prospective owner-occupant as set forth in Civil Code 2924m(a)(1).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1811549/small_1728665914-avatar-fridmanproperti.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
13 July 2024 | 10 replies
Besides comprehensive lease agreements outlining the tenant’s property maintenance and damage prevention responsibilities, I am also thinking about signing with a tenant's additional agreement with all prices for typical damages which they need to sign with a lease.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2904971/small_1703704898-avatar-shanei10.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 July 2024 | 5 replies
Even so, are there are other considerations like family or significant other that prevent you from considering a move like this?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1930319/small_1729519343-avatar-sergiop52.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 July 2024 | 15 replies
We are in a reverse frog boil environment - Instead of boiling to death slowly they raised IR so fast that people are unsure/unclear when it's a good time to come back in - they will more than likely lower rates 1/8 to 1/4 point at a time, incredibly slow to allow the market drip back to normal preventing a surgeI'm also seeing people drop $5,600,000 in cash to $13,000,000 in cash like it's nothingCash rules down in florida even on 889K deals
11 July 2024 | 10 replies
Having the tenant makes it:A) harder to show the property, making it harder to sellB) prevents a majority of owner occupant buyers from being able to offer on the home.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/3014183/small_1725226039-avatar-deed89.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 July 2024 | 15 replies
These policies always weed out competition, ultimately backfiring on the very people they are intended to protect.I’ll invest as always in CO, and while I won’t vote for people who push such policies, I’ll keep investing, knowing that more government prevents the market from working and introducing supply long-term, limiting my competition and driving up rents and demand from quality tenants ever faster.