This reminds me of the discussion around pricing things at $x.99 instead of $x+1.00.EXAMPLE: $4.99 instead of $5.00Everyone "knows" that the price in the example is basically $5.So, why do billion dollar companies, spending more on marketing departments than everyone's combined income on this thread, STILL use the $x.99 pricing format?

Remind you they selling homes been vacant 5 years or more with lots of problems.

Either way, it’s a stark reminder of how technology, when unchecked, can amplify inequality.What Do You Think?

I would thank him for his feedback and share that you made a business decision that is mutually beneficial (https://www.avail.co/education/articles/should-you-collect-r...scroll down towards the bottom of the page to see the comparison) which includes providing the tenant with a receipt and rent reminders.  

If you do get someone who stays for an extended period you can remind them again after the booking. 

Being able to A/B test MTR at the same time would allow you to know if you can convert the STR to MTR if you ever want to move out and keep the property.As for the net negative house hacks - I always like to remind people that shy away from a deal because they aren't making money that they are usually still coming out ahead if they are spending the same or less than they would on rent.Great last point.

Sometimes vendors get short-sighted and need to be reminded to not be ridiculous. 

Your experience reminds me to manage the portfolio well (i.e. sell losers) and to be patient. 

One think I sometimes try to remind people is that EVERY APPLICANT qualifies for a rental!

I appreciate the reminder.