Ha, well we are a bit different then in terms of small.

In terms of actual job experience, I am a rookie to both accounting and real estate.

In IRR we can see that Deal 2, is a better deal, in terms of return on the capital invested considering time.

The price point might look good now, but in terms of longevity it's a poor investment.

If the commission's plan make sense in terms of managing the ratio of temporary housing versus permanent along with other infrastructure than perhaps the area might not be a future bust.

The higher the bid the more they make in terms of mark up.

In terms of cash flow, that's a terrible investment.

Here's the best example -- tax cuts on the rich have often been provided in terms of cutting capital gains tax.

While there can be some cost savings in terms of a lower electric rate, for example, people just do not care about conservation- especially the tenants who never have to pay the bill or see the financials.

I mean in terms of prices.