You are required to be an expert in only three areas instead of 7 (Knowing the market, finding deals, and negotiating with sellers) and you have already hit your end goal of owning an asset and making monthly passive income.Why not start at the top of the food chain instead of the bottom?

People don’t sue people that qualify for food stamps.

They want to stay in their position while someone else pays for it.At the end of the day, I need to put food on the table for my family and each one who unfairly wants something from me takes away from my ability to do so.

This all meant to be food for thought. not a definitive proof f one thing or anotherWhat i take from this is similar to my thoughts on flipping.

We low balled & won on 2 that were a disaster but still flipped them for double after we cleaned them up a bit.Had another with a kitchen full of rotting food, we got in through an 'opened' back door.

In this case, the first lender's whiny attitude and emotional appeal that I'm taking food out of his kids' mouths doesn't sit well with me at all. 

People don’t sue people that qualify for food stamps.

People don’t sue people that qualify for food stamps.

If it does, you just need to be prepared to wait it out.One other piece of food for thought: That first condo I bought had a train-wreck of an HOA.

Bring it on, I am much more worried about a 200 unit apartment building coming in down the street than only being able to raise rents 7% + CPI per year.This is something I sent to a local charity we have supported (oregon food bank) which decided to come out in support of the bill.My last point is this, rent controls and tenant protections lead to decreased supply and strengthen both the pricing power, average rents and value of the owner's of existing properties.