One is a family of 3 - mom, dad, and newborn baby (parents are in their 30's). 

My parents can also give each of my children $30,000 (dad gives $15k to child, mom gives $15k to child).

Is it truly better to avoid "discrimination" and let an ax muderer or child molester move into your property? 

Its a very specific rental as the full bath is essentially a jack and jill off the master with the other entrance in the hallway next to the 2 other bedrooms. 1/2 bath is upstairs and basement has no bath.Advertised it for awhile at 2000, didn't really get a lot of bites. dropped to 1850, got some people interested but no one I wanted to live next to(owner/occupied at the time) Dropped it to 1700 and the flood gates opened and I have the best renters in there I could imagine.I spent over 3 months trying to rent it, a lot of which was because I wanted to pick my neighbors for the sake of my wife and I have a newborn.

I found these 2 paragraphs particularly intriguing:In a similar vein, the Missouri statute requires you to disclose in writing whether the property was the site “[e]ndangering the welfare of a child” through “physical injury.”

I have never ever ever heard of the manufactured homes drawing more rent than a stick built in same area unless its on a lake but I would give up the naming rights to my next child that is not true under similar circumstances.

If you were to dissolve the Nevada LLC and form a Series LLC, then you could house both those properties under the same"parent" LLC as separate "child" series that would separate liability.

I would be delighted if my return were considered child's play.

My question is, as the official property managers, would we be legally in the line of fire if a tenant decides to sue because they didn't receive the lead disclosure and their child now has asthma?

Your target market is a single professional or a young couple no kids or with child less than 5 years old.